Parul University Digital Repository

Effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization versus Neural Mobilization in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparative Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Solanki, Mayur
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-09T04:00:27Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-09T04:00:27Z
dc.date.issued 2015-05
dc.identifier.issn 2319-7064
dc.identifier.uri http://ir.paruluniversity.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/7381
dc.description.abstract The goal of individualized program requires analysis of benefits of mulligan mobilization versus neural mobilization in the patients with Cervical Radiculopathy. Neural mobilizations include facilitation of nerve gliding, dispersion of noxious fluids, increase in neurovascularity and axoplasmicflow. Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement (MWM) involving application of accessory passive glide to the cervical vertebrae while patient simultaneously performs active movement. To achieve this purpose 50 patients, diagnosed with cervical radiculopathy recruited from Physiotherapy Department, Sainath Hospital, Ahmedabad were divided into two groups mulligan mobilization and neural mobilization. Outcomes were visual analogue scale (VAS) & Neck Disability Index (NDI). Neural mobilization produces greater comfort and better functional outcome as compared to mulligun mobilization analysed by application of Mann Whitney Test. (P<0. 0001). en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) | Volume 4 | Issue 5 en_US
dc.subject Neural mobilization en_US
dc.subject Mulligan mobilization en_US
dc.title Effectiveness of Mulligan Mobilization versus Neural Mobilization in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparative Study en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account